Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

 

A European Perspective by ~fcl:iconfcl:



The American Dream and the actual developments

It can not be doubted that the „American Dream“ had a very strong influence on what the United States of America refer to as their social constitution – but how far can these roots and origins still be traced back?

This question becomes especially interesting and important when lookin at actions that have been undertaken by the United States of America in the recent past: Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, non-conformance - to the Kyoto Protocols, breaking the rules of the law of nations (like attacking a foreign state without an assignment from the United Nations) or abusing long term allies because they have their own opinions – not a list that goes well with the self-proclaimed pretension of a “Great Society”.

There are many prejudices concerning Americans that Europeans might have – some even go as far as calling them all stupid and fat, politically disinteressed egomaniacs who tend to think of themselves as the “policemen of the world” (like they put it in the 1910s). Sadly many of these prejudices are actually true – according to a recently published study which compared the weights of children from different industrial nations the ones from the United States are the fattest – and they even have a big headstart, reasons for this phenomenom are easy to locate: fast food, television and not enough exercise. Is this really what the American Dream meant by “a better and richer life”?

Everyone in the USA is aware of the fact that the possibilities to transfer from one social class to another are very limited – the dream of the dishwasher becoming a milionaire might be true for one or people , but it is not to be doubted that being a member of a black underclass family means that you will have to spend your whole life in these social – except you are to become a sports star and can aid in the “cheap amusement” sector, sadly this economical sector is only mentioned as a danger but not a gift to the American Dream.

During the third Gulf War it became obvious to the whole of the world society that the United States of America tended to see themselves as the great democratic nation  whose goal it is to destroy every possible threat that might endanger the lifestyle of the American  nation – this becomes especially obvious when quoting Wolfowitz, who did not mention the humanitarian aspects of the war but said, “that we cannot let such a country control so much of the world oil reserves”, because without them the current lifestyle could no longer be maintained – this does not show any thought of cultural wellbeing but only a desire for economical gain.

Interestingly it seems as if the American population is held “dumb” by the upper class – class-consciousness, the worst foe of the true American Dream, arose again in the new design of the mass media. The results of the current media-propaganda mix can be studied through the example of Jessica Lynch – for the Americans she is a hero, rescued by Special Forces from a hostile enviroment, they think of her as having fought against the evil enemies with all she had. For the ones who know the truth this is nothing but humbug – she did not get shot but got caught under the tyres of an American car and the ambush could only take place because the responsible officer was unable to read the card material, not to speak of the hostile hospital in which she got the best bed, alone in her room, and where not one armed foe threatened her.

She is only the sad hero of a truly American story which tries to beat into the heads of the American population the myth of the American Dream – but if this dream were like the actual society, it would merely be a weak nightmare.
©2004-2009 ~fcl
:iconfcl:

Author's Comments

This text tries to give an insight on the european perspective on the current development of the american dream - I wrote it before Abu Ghraib became public so this event is not covered in here.

Comments


love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconsarshelyam:
Hmmm....

So do you believe this? I mean, don't take Michael Moore's goods as our bible, I know you didn't mention him...but many put a lot of faith into the man and his views.

Certainly every country has its share of problems, we're no different, and yes...in many ways I think our country DOES feel the need to police the world, but it wasn't something we asked for. Events shortly after WWII put the country into a position where it felt necessary to repend and ammend many of the mistakes we had committed. Some countries rejoice at the aid, others reject it...and the silent ones simply sit in the shadows and point fingers. Well, it's easy to do so when these "quiet" countries do little to help.

Ah, I'm not angry so please don't think I'm attacking your words. I'm actually quite happy someone from outside of the US has taken a moment to enlighten us on their perspectives. Just be thoughtful that it's incredibly easy to judge from the outside...take a step in and you may see things a little differently. And that comment is NOT meant to justify anything our country does at all. It's simply that perspectives are formed by the media alone these days and often time it's overglorified & overglammourized...you name it...it's either incredibly pretty, or incredibly ugly lacking all median in-betweeners.

--
Proud Member:
\\ :bulletblue: Vector Brothers (and Sisters) Unite!! :bulletblue: \\
\\ :bulletblue: The Vector-Art Community :bulletblue: \\
:iconfcl:
In fact I did not think so much of Michael Moore when writing this essay but of "Of Paradise and Power" by Robert Kagan as I disagree with his thoughts. It is of course easier to judge from the outside - but many european countries stated their doubts about the third Gulf War and questioned the "evidence" given by the united states administration - and they were right. I do not want to question that Saddam Hussein was a dictator, he certainly was cruel and Iraq is better without him - but instead of bringing peace to this part of the world the current administration of the United States only increased anti-american and anti-western resentimments among the arab population of the middle east.

Kagan describes in his book - which is very well written and a real pleasure to read - a world which is divided into a kantian (european) and a hobbesian (america, britain, new europe, coalition of the willing) part. I hold this to be incorrect because europeans are well aware of these problems, we just have totally different approaches. In a hobbesian world the one with the force can always do a preemptive strike which is not necessarily bad. But every preemptive strike needs not only an approval by the world community (the United Nations) and therefore a consensus between different views but also a moral legitimation - a preemptive strike might turn morally legal in case the evidence given and the problems described are solved by this strike and could only be solved this way - but once this procedure fails, if you only are wrong once your moral legitimation is wrecked for a long time to come.

This happened to the United States right now and that is why europeans look more on issues - we had so many preemptive strikes in our history, we had so many failed moral legitimations, we do not want more. Europe nowadays focuses more on shutting down, on solving the reasons for problems - not on fighting the excrescenes of problems. This takes more time but is even more satisfying in the end.

I admire the United States for the ideals they stand for and for being the oldest modern democracy - but still I can not help but criticise the change of view concerning the American Dream.

Thanks for your comment - I highly appreciate that you took the time to read through it, James! :)

--
Und handeln sollst Du so, als hinge /
von dir und deinem Tun allein /
das Schicksal ab der deutschen Dinge /
und die Verantwortung wär’ dein.
:iconfcl:
I just digged a link to a quite interesting with Bob Kagan, it can be found here: [link]
Oh, and I really recommend his book, it is book though I mostly disagree with most parts, but what would be a demcracy without intellectual stimulation from many different directions? :D

--
Und handeln sollst Du so, als hinge /
von dir und deinem Tun allein /
das Schicksal ab der deutschen Dinge /
und die Verantwortung wär’ dein.
:icondarkandlightfurry:
A very good editorial. Made me think a lot about my own "american dream". Of course being that I live here in the U.S. I've been exposed to this dream most of my life. It's been drilled into my head that we're the best in the world and have to show it to everyone. Even I've been taught that I can only be happy and successful if i pay thousands of dollars to go to an expensive college and get a job making six to seven figures a year to pay for my own expenses and those of my parents when the get older.

Personally I think that we had no reason to go over there to begin with, mostly for the reasons you stated. Keep up the good work and I look forward to seeing more.

--
You're so cold, keep your hand in mine. So Cold - Breaking Benjamin
:iconnuliajuk:
As a Canadian and part of a nation who feels the constant presence of "the elephant sleeping next to the mouse" I am always interested in essays written about an outisde perspective of American policies.

However I am interested in your use of phrases such as "All Americans". What it a deliberate stylistic choice to use this generality. Just another writer curious about your style.


--------------------

There are no truths... only stories.
:iconfcl:
Did I really say "all americans"? *looks* Ah! Okay, I used it as a stylistic device, a form of exaggeration. I did not want to generalize but to show that there are many prejudices about americans in Europe - which causes misunderstandings. Still some of them are true, so I tried to show what is thought of america in europe, what is true of it and in how far this connects to the American Dream.

Thanks for your comment. :)

--
Und handeln sollst Du so, als hinge /
von dir und deinem Tun allein /
das Schicksal ab der deutschen Dinge /
und die Verantwortung wär’ dein.
:iconeviscerator:
No country has the right to police the world. If they did it brings about the whole "Who watches the watchers?" Argument. The war in Iraq was the RIGHT thing to do. However it was done for the WRONG reasons. Saddam did need to be removed. While America has no right to police the world, it does have a right to respond to possible threats. Saddam was a possible threat. Note the word POSSIBLE. As it turns out, it looks like he had no weapons of mass destruction at all. A pre emptive strike would be a good form of defence, but all Bush has managed to do is alienate himself, and his country further from the rest of the world. And I'm ashamed to say it, but he's dragging my country (the UK) with it.

I've spoken to lots of Americans. I've spoken to the stereotypical yank, with his beer in one hand and his TV remote in the other, and I have spoken to some actual intelligent Americans too. In just about every case, Americans I have spoken to think thier country DOES have more political and social problems than other countries. That is proportionatley, so it's larger size is no excuse.

I once said "A smart American is an unhappy American while in America."

A lot of Americans agree with me.

--
Gospel Truth. Honest.
:iconfcl:
I think we both agree that there is a difference between a morally righful and a legitimated war - the one is a preemptive strike which is morally justified because of the actions the state under attack did commit and after the war the attackers are still in a morally high position because of them having prevented a humanitarian catastrophy (eg Cosovo) or having freed a country from dicatorship and the other one is an ordered action which was legalized by the Security Council of the United Nations. The bit but with a "morally legitimated preemptive strike" is that whatever you use to justify your position has to be true - before and after the war - otherwise, and like now, you have a big, big mess.

Instead of trying to police the world higher efforts should be shifted towards the reform of the Security Council of the UN where five member states have the veto right and therefore can prevent the second option, the legalized warfare. The possibility most diplomats seem to prefer would be a higher ammount of permanent members and the abolishment of the Veto, thereby making it possible for this highest decision organ of the UN to work faster and with better results.

The tendency of states to "do it alone" should not be accepted, regardless of which country tries to act this way - otherwise we will never achieve a system in which morally justified preemptive strikes can be legalized by the organisation that was founded to ensure a fair treatment of all states - the United Nations.

--
Und handeln sollst Du so, als hinge /
von dir und deinem Tun allein /
das Schicksal ab der deutschen Dinge /
und die Verantwortung wär’ dein.
:iconsarshelyam:
True...it's the narrow-mindedness that creates most of the problems in the world today afterall!

--
Proud Member:
\\ :bulletblue: Vector Brothers (and Sisters) Unite!! :bulletblue: \\
\\ :bulletblue: The Vector-Art Community :bulletblue: \\

Details

July 29, 2004
3.8 KB

Statistics

18
2 [who?]
203 (0 today)
12 (0 today)

Share

Link
Thumb

Site Map